Primary Industries and Fisheries appear confident of Magistrate Strofield's Decision, else, why would they write to advise Geraldine Robertson?

The hearing finished on the 27th November 2008. At 26th May 2009 no decision has been advised by the Court. Why would it take so long if the Courts are not corrupt. Geraldine Robertson went to court to get her poodles back - By delaying a decision the poodles are not coming back. Geraldine Robertson loses by delay without an appealable decision. What type of Legal system do we have? Conclusion "Courts are corrupt".

By the time, if any, Geraldine Robertson gets her World Famous NEIGER Poodles back the Poodle Club of Queensland Members will have bred them to death. All those beautiful and rare red, brown and apricot coloured poodles will be in oversupply in Queensland. Geraldine Robertson was robbed by institutionally corrupt government and RSPCA.

In this letter Dianne Condon for DPI writes:

I confirm that in the event your appeal is dismissed, and the forfeiture or forfeitures upheld, the First Respondent proposes to request of the Magistrate in that His Honour give a direction pursuant to section 204(2) of the Animal Care and Protection Act 2001 in the following terms:

"It is directed that in respect of the confirmed forfeiture/s. the Second Respondent may, after the expiration of one calendar month from today, and provided there are no pending appeal proceedings under section 205 of the Animal Care and Protections Act 2001 or consequent on the same, sell or dispose of the animal/s as it considers fair and in the proper interests of each animal/s. "

Considering this was known from the very beginning why write to tell Geraldine Robertson other than prepare her for a loss in her Appeal for the return of her poodles.