Our Labor Anna Bligh Government,
After the 5 years of the worst drought experienced by Queensland prior December 2007 to flash flooding in SE Qld and frequent heavy rainfalls since, there were frequent reports of the % of water in the Wivenhoe Dam in referance to water conservation. It was obvious there were large amounts of rain in the dam's catchments area as the rain event over several weeks had reportedly moved south from Townsville. Our Premier and other Labor politicians believed and supported Global Warming Lies and were convinced Queensland would suffer droughts as predicted by their "Global Warming Experts" without proven proper calculations, allowed the Wivenhoe Dam to be - over 190% capacity before the rain event reached Brisbane.
The BLIGH's announcement for a commission to look into the opening of the Wivenhoe Dam's flood gates is another cover up of her's and the Labor government's incompetance . More public funds spent on her wealthy mates!
The squander of our public funds by the Labor Governments must be stopped.Our jails are full of innocent people who could not afford lawyers.
Being charged with a criminal offence can cost over $100,000 to defend.
Few people get legal aid. Legal aid for expediency will negotiate guilty with mitigating circumstances
forcing innocent people to plead guilty. Prosecutors will litigate for
attrition wasting defendant's money on needless legal
"negotiations" till the charged person runs out of money and
has to become self represented. This was done to Geraldine Robertson by
Commissioner Kathy Rynders gave bravery medals to two of six officers involved in Doomadgee's death or murder - his spleen, a well protected organ, was smashed.
Gives RSPCA the legislated right to lie in Court to keep property seized (legally stolen) from their victims, abuse the courts whose duty is to support the Government against its people.
Animal Care and Protection Act 2001 - S205 Appeal to District Court: An appeal lies to a District Court from a decision of the Magistrates Court, but only on a question of law. That RSPCA witnesses fabricated evidence, lied in the Court, promised the Magistrate a promotion to a District Court Judge, intimidated witnesses, tutored witnesses, used the media to make the matter political such that the victim must lose for political reasons can not be an issue in the appeals that follow. Then the Court of Appeal ambushes the victim by making its decision on the false and misleading evidence so called facts of the case, facts that could not be disputed in any appeals.
Has promised RSPCA breeder identification legislation in 2012 so RSPCA can harvest the best puppies to sell for their own profit. RSPCA will no longer have to lie to keep their seized properties. ban pet shops selling live pets, prosecute anyone who buys a live pet from anywhere other than from RSPCA and its supporters.
Anna Bligh hates us except if you are fanatic or wealthy. Anna Bligh wants us to be weak and vulnerable so her mates can become wealthy taking everything we have.
Anna Bligh makes lots of caring statements in the media while in reality she makes laws for fanatics that demonstrates her hatred of people. With all the new laws and amended laws Anna Bligh has taken from Queenslanders our rights and freedoms and exposed all of us to abuses of power and theft through those mates she had given control of those laws to, to obtain our properties denying us our legal remedies through magistrates and judges supporting her government. Examples of Queenslanders losing our rights and freedoms, are many.
As an example of how corrupt Anna Bligh is look at Section 205 of the Animal Care and Protection Act, "Appeal to District Court - An appeal lies to a District Court from a decision of the Magistrates Court, but only on a question of law ". This means RSPCA are allowed to lie and get away as what they say cannot be questioned. In Robertson v DPI&F and RSPCA Anna Bligh promised Magistrate Strofield a promotion to be a District Court Judge after a short stint in Charleville for covering up for her government supported animal fanatics RSPCA. What followed was an ambush in the District Court and Supreme Court of Appeal in Robertson v Dept of Primary Industries and Fisheries & RSPCA  QCA 147. The Appeal was on law only pursuant to section 205 Animal Care and Protection Act. So the Court of Appeal strikes out Robertson's Appeal on the invented "facts" (real lies) of RSPCA animal fanatics ensuring Geraldine Robertson could not dispute under the law. To achieve this result, the Courts ignored the law in Robertson's grounds for appeal. The Appeal pursuant to the Act must be based on law only. “Natural justice is not law” argued RSPCA Counsel Richard Fryberg and the Supreme Court of Appeal on 2 seperate cases accepted that outburst. The reality is RSPCA have acted with extreme malice towards Geraldine Robertson in order to protect RSPCA theft of valuable pedigreed dogs and the and will not only accepted the incredible provable lies by RSPCA but made further distortion of RSPCA lies in its reasons to support its' Decision .
The Court of Appeal supported and approved RSPCA dirty tactics. But far worse, RSPCA should never have been made a party in this case under the Law except the court disobeyed the law and allowed RSPCA to be a party because the Appeal was against the Government's decision to forfeit her world famous Neiger Poodles to the State (which were then given immediately to RSPCA). Evidence of RSPCA pre organised sale of 48 pedigreed poodles seized on the day of the seizure were not allowed to be presented in Court. RSPCA animal fanatics were allowed to use dirty tactics on Geraldine Robertson - ATTRITION - illegally negotiating with Robertson's lawyers. Geraldine Robertson borrowed monies from the bank and it was all gone before she could get her appeal filed in the Magistrates Court. Geraldine Robertson had to prepare her Notice of Appeal and supporting Affidavit herself. RSPCA solicitors spoke and wrote communicating with Geraldine Robertson's solicitors consuming all her available funds and this is how dishonest RSPCA is.
RSPCA animal fanatics continued a campaign of abuse, death threats and harassment that lasted almost 3 years , till, after spending time in hospital from stress related symptoms Geraldine Robertson made a complaint against Mark Towend CEO of RSPCA under the Peace and Good Behaviour Act. The harassment stopped then started again when the Magistrate decided she could not make a complaint against Mark Townend CEO of RSPCA. It stopped when this decision was appealed to the District Court, which decided Geraldine Robertson could not appeal the Magistrates Decision. It did not get started again because within a day an appeal was lodged in the Court of Appeal. There are successful appeals in the District Court and Court of Appeal for similar cases. Judges and Magistrates corruptly decide for their mates. While the Peace and Good Behaviour Complaint has been in Court the harassment has all but stopped completely. When the Court of Appeal strikes out Geraldine Robertson's appeal RSPCA will be back to their dirty tactics habitual behaviour. Refer to others so named "animal abusers" who were in fact all responsible caring breeders in small businesses. Geraldine Robertson was not the only victim of RSPCA.
RSPCA ambush Robertson in the District Court in Robertson v Dept of Primary Industries and Fisheries & RSPCA  No 2268 of 2009. In the District Court Robertson's appeal was struck out on the grounds that there were no valid grounds in law and “ Natural justice is not law ”. Seizing my evidence and disappearing it, scaring away witnesses, malice towards the RSPCA victim by RSPCA, intimidating witnesses fabricating evidence, and credibility of witnesses was not considered valid grounds. Restricting the Magistrates Court Hearing to only the reasonable belief of Inspectors and RSPCA forfeiture decision favored RSPCA and protected its decision to seize Robertson's dogs and denied Robertson the proper trial of all the facts. The court deleting vital evidence to save RSPCA, provable as it was an open court and there were others who were witnesses to that hearing - was not allowed -another reason for the strike out. RSPCA Lawyers Clayton Utz lied in saying the Magistrates Court decision was based on Robertson being found guilty of animal abuse WHEN the decision was based on the "reasonable belief of the Inspectors to prevent abuse and neglect in the future". The evidence supplied by RSPCA, fabricated by RSPCA were shown up as such in the Magisrates Court hearing. There were no statement stating Robertson's valuable dogs were abused or neglected by the crafty Magistrate court in it's decision.